Vying For The Title Of 'Hottest Hatch': Meet The Hyundai Veloster N

Vying For The Title Of 'Hottest Hatch': Meet The Hyundai Veloster N

When a hot hatch is propelled by a 275hp turbocharged engine, employs 19-inch wheels, a launch control and torque steer, on purpose mind you, then you know the manufacturer has their own unique philosophy of fun. That’s exactly what I found when I tested the new Hyundai Veloster N in California recently.

This is the best handling car to come out of the halls of Hyundai, well, ever. Actually, it also just happens to be one of the best looking cars ever born in Korea. There’s a reason for that. To get straight to the heart of the matter, the class-leading handling and great looks all comes down to a perfect fusion of Korean technology, reliability and vision, and German design and performance tuning.

I could not pen this story without first mentioning the integral part that two legendary Germans played in the creation of Korea’s hottest ever hatch. Ex-Audi senior designer Peter Schreyer, who arrived at the Hyundai-Kia group a decade ago, is now head of design for both brands. He and his team are responsible for not only this hatch but more poignantly, they've successfully elevated the brand's designs and aesthetics to levels comparable with some of Europe's top makes. Meanwhile, taking Hyundai’s performance and handling to a whole new level was Albert Biermann, the former BMW M Division chief engineer who is now holding Hyundai’s R&D reigns, which the brand calls its “N” high-performance department. He particularly revelled with the settings on the Veloster N.

This hatch also just happens to be one of the best looking cars to ever come out of Korea.PHOTO BY YASUHIKO SATO

Incorporating a huge hungry-looking hexagonal grille, sharp upslanting headlights, big wheels, red brake calipers and a sporty rear roof wing, the hatch’s addictive sky blue and bright red accents around the front spoiler and side skirts put it very much in a league with the iconic VW Golf GTI. The funky 3-door layout (4-door is you include the hatchback) with a rear passenger door only built into the right-hand side of the car, give the Veloster N special presence on the road.

Inside, this hot hatch gets a suitably sporty cockpit made out of inexpensive materials with nice touches like the leather wrapped gear-shifter and steering wheel, competent 8-inch BlueLink infotainment and sat-nav system, audio features and Android and Apple connectivity features, as well as supportive seats for those extended-right-boot-into-corner moments.

The interior is subtle but well appointed.PHOTO BY YASUHIKO SATO

But the undisputed highlight of the Veloster N is what sits under that hood. While the base Veloster N gets 250hp from its 2.0-liter turbocharged power unit, the tweaked N-spec performance version we tested is rated at 275hp peak power and 260lb-ft of torque. Even without flicking on the launch control, the Veloster N rockets off the line, jumping from zero to 60mph in under 6 seconds.

Torque is particularly strong between 3000-6000 rpm and seems to enjoy hovering around the 3500 mark allowing the turbo to stay vocal with an addictive whistle. This car is plenty quick with a beefy exhaust under heavy acceleration and a curious but colorful cocktail of pops and crackles exuding from the exhaust when you lift off.

As a sports car traditionalist, I particularly liked Hyundai’s brave decision to opt for one gearbox only—a 6-speed manual. As the revs climb quickly while the 19-inch Pirelli P-Zeros fight for grip, the limited slip diff on this front-drive hatch works hard to control understeer and torque steer. But as Biermann will say, ‘some torque steer was purposefully left in the mix to give the driver a feel for the power,” and that this addition was a calculated feature of the car. Yes, the Veloster N does have some torque steer under heavy acceleration, but it’s easy to control, and as he says, it does add to the overall sportiness of this rare hatch.

Any hatch with such power would normally be fitted with high-performance, 4-pot Brembos. But in their wisdom, Hyundai decided to keep costs down and furnish the car’s needs in-house. The result is better than expected. Pedal rigidity is tight and braking performance is more than acceptable. In fact, the Veloster N’s stoppers are borrowed from the Optima, but given grippier pads, while special cooling ducts built into the N's functional aerodynamic sheetmetal, keep those rotors and pads from getting too warm and fading.

This hatch feels light on its feet but nimble and stable in the corners with perfectly weighted steering. It transfers its weight superbly mid-corner and sounds great doing it. For just under $30,000, you’d have to look hard and long for a hot hatch with better cost performance.

Source: Forbes

Genesis G70, Ram 1500 and Hyundai Kona win North American car, truck, utility awards

Genesis G70, Ram 1500 and Hyundai Kona win North American car, truck, utility awards

DETROIT — The Genesis G70 won the 2019 North American Car of the Year at the Detroit auto show, while the Ram 1500 took truck honors and the Hyundai Kona was named top utility vehicle of the year.

This year's winners were selected by a jury of about 60 American and Canadian automotive journalists — including Automotive News reporter Richard Truett and Senior Editor Sharon Silke Carty— from a group of three finalists in each category. A vehicle must have been redesigned or significantly changed to be eligible for the award.

The Genesis G70 beat the Honda Insight and Volvo S60. This is the third win in the car category for Hyundai Motor Group, which won with the Hyundai Genesis in 2009 and the Elantra in 2012. In 2017, its G90 was a finalist but lost to the Chevrolet Bolt.

The Ram 1500 surpassed the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and the GMC Sierra 1500. Only three vehicles were eligible for the truck segment, so by default, all three became finalists. Even though the Silverado, Sierra and Ram were all redesigned this year, the media lavishly praised the Ram for its interior. The Ram has not earned the finalist status since 2013, when the model took home the truck category win.

Reid Bigland, FCA's head of U.S. sales, credited workers at the automaker's two Detroit area plants in Warren and Sterling Heights for the win. 

"The fit and finish on this vehicle is phenomenal. It's a team effort to bring a vehicle like this to the market," said Bigland.  "It's just a real honor to be nominated for the truck of the year.  We've been there before but to win it is much sweeter."

The Hyundai Kona took utility vehicle of the year, beating out the Acura RDX and Jaguar I-Pace. This is the fourth year of the utility category — previously crossovers, SUVs and minivans competed in the truck category. It's also the first time two electric vehicles — the Jaguar I-Pace and Hyundai Kona — competed in the mix.

Yong-woo (William) Lee, CEO of Hyundai Motor North America, said every employee, from designers to the marketing team, played a part in Kona's utility honor.

"This is the first time Hyundai has won the vehicle of the year award and it is something that means a lot to us," he said.  "We appreciate the time and effort that's put into this competition.  This was an unexpected win for us."

OMARI GARDNER

Vehicles are judged on several categories including innovation, design, safety, performance, technology, value and driver satisfaction. Winners were selected in a third elimination stage.

The three finalists in each category were chosen from a list of 14 cars, 12 utilities and three trucks in November. Models on that short list were narrowed down from a list of 47 in fall, which consisted of 23 cars, 21 SUVs and three trucks.

The Audi A6, Buick Regal Tour X, Hyundai Veloster, Kia Forte, Mazda6, Mercedes-Benz A class, Nissan Altima, Nissan Leaf, Toyota Avalon, Toyota Corolla Hatchback and Volkswagen Jetta were the other cars on the short list.

Other eligible utilities were the BMW X5, Cadillac XT4, Hyundai Santa Fe, Infiniti QX50, Jeep Wrangler, Nissan Kicks, Subaru Ascent, Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC40.

Juror observations

The diversity in this year's lineup made it challenging for jurors to vote for which vehicles should go to the next round, said NACTOY President and juror Lauren Fix.

She told Automotive News on Friday that jurors knew the Genesis G70 would make it to the finalists round after they test drove it at the semifinalists event in October, but they had no idea what vehicles would take the other two spots. She also said she knew the Jaguar I-Pace and Acura RDX would make it the moment she got into the vehicle.

The Jaguar I-Pace and Hyundai Kona make it the first time that the NACTOY has seen two electric vehicles in the mix. This year's top nine also includes the Honda Insight, a hybrid.

Fix said she was surprised the Kia Optima wasn't a finalist because drivers can get "everything they want in a vehicle for $24,000."

She added: "But then what vehicle would I take off the list that wasn't as good? That's the question."

The NACTOY president said the nine finalists demonstrated top quality, good technology and nothing short than best in safety.

Since contenders in the truck category were finalists by default, Fix said the winner is one that demonstrates the best towing capacity, performance and safety features. In other words, it's about hauling people, hauling objects, and its utility and capability, she said.

The Honda Accord, Lincoln Navigator and Volvo XC60 won the 2018 North American Car, Truck and Utility of the Year awards.

The fascinating engineering behind VW's electric car platform of the future

Volkswagen, the company that brought us Dieselgate, wants us forget its last eco-disaster by promising to bring affordable electric cars to the masses starting in 2020. Those cars will ride on an all-new electric platform called MEB. The automaker calls it “one of the most important projects in the history of Volkswagen,” and says MEB will underpin more than 1 million EVs per year starting in 2025.

Last fall, I had a chance to look at the new architecture and speak with some engineers. Here’s what I learned. 

(Full Disclosure: VW wanted to show me its new MEB platform, so the company flew me to Dresden, fed me potato soup and schnitzel, and put a nice roof over my head.)

Volkswagen brought journalists to its glass factory in Dresden for the world premier of the automaker’s Modular Electric Drive Matrix, or MEB, platform, which the company promises will be the “economic and technological backbone” behind its goal to bring EVs from niche into the mainstream. The result of clever platform sharing, VW told journalists, will be electric cars with pricing similar to that of a “comparable diesel car.” A more recent story by Reuters stated that VW could sell an entry level MEB vehicle for as little as $23,000.

VW plans to build 150,000 electric cars in 2020, (100,000 of which will be the I.D. compact car and I.D. SUV, which are both expected to premiere in 2020), offer 27 all-new EV models across four brands by 2022, and offer an electric version of every single one of its 300+ models by 2030. In total, the company expects to build at least 10 million EVs based on this new MEB platform, and Reuters reported last month that this could go up to 15 million.

But we’ve been hearing a lot of companies announcing lofty electrification plans like these, so what makes VW different? Well, they’ve at least got hardware to back up the talk. Here’s a look at what might be the platform that actually brings electric cars to the masses.

The MEB Platform

VW started designing the MEB platform—the company’s very first high volume EV architecture—about three years ago. Like Tesla vehicles, it comes in either rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive configurations, and is built around a flat, rectangular battery pack that’s bolted beneath the vehicle’s floor.

This all makes it closer to a Tesla than to a Fiat 500e or a number of other EVs from mainstream manufacturers that use normal car platforms modified to be electric. Those cars tend to have batteries crammed under seats and other drive components sandwiched where an internal combustion engine would be. That and they’re usually front-wheel drive only.

The VW ID layout—with its short hood and long wheelbase, lack of driveshaft or exhaust tunnel, and small overhangs—promises a low center of gravity, high cabin and trunk volume, and also a higher seating position compared to an internal combustion engine vehicle in the same class.

Speaking of that higher seating position, Volkswagen says the ID’s giant 18- to 21-inch wheels were sized, in part, to help provide the thick battery pack with the additional ground clearance it needs. By contrast, today’s Golf can be had with 15-inchers. That low-mounted battery, which will initially come in roughly 50 kWh and 80 kWh sizes (more to come in the future, VW says), is expected to offer between 205 and 342 miles of range on Europe’s new WLTP cycle, or around 175 to 300 miles on the EPA cycle.

One Architecture for Many Vehicles

Early this decade, Volkswagen introduced the Modular Transverse Matrix, or MQB, an extremely flexible car platform that allowed the company to share as many components and assembly processes across as many vehicles as possible. It can span cars like the small VW Golf up to the giant seven-passenger VW Atlas as efficiently and inexpensively as possible. In total, MQB currently represents 80 percent of VW Group’s sales volume, with about 55 million having been produced thus far.

MEB is essentially this same platform strategy but applied to electric cars. It is supposedly capable of underpinning everything from the aforementioned I.D. compact car (which VW also refers to as the “Neo”) and I.D. Crozz SUV, to a sedan based on the I.D. Vizzion concept, to a modern interpretation of the VW Microbus based on the I.D. Buzz concept. Production versions of the latter two are scheduled for launch in 2022.

Tino Fuhrmann, the head of the MEB project, actually says MEB offers “less variance than the MQB platform,” making it an economical way to build different kinds of electric cars with as little complexity as possible.

The platform will be primarily built of conventional materials like steel, though there were a few aluminum components on the chassis shown in Dresden, including the steering knuckles and the battery housing. Different vehicle segments are expected to get different aluminum content, with the I.D. Vizzion sedan, for example, getting more than the cheaper, compact Neo. This aligns with Tesla’s strategy of using mostly steel on the cheaper Model 3 rather than an aluminum-intensive body design like those of the Model S and Model X. By contrast, the probably over-ambitious BMW i3had a body structure made entirely of carbon fiber, but that, according to Car and Driver, may be a thing of the past thanks to battery advancements, quoting head of BMW’s i Division Robert Irlinger as saying:

“At the time of the BMW i3, the capacity of batteries was still quite low, and so we tried to get every kilogram out of the car to reduce the amount of energy we needed [to power it]...But, with the improving energy capacity of batteries, you don’t need to look for the last 500 grams. Therefore, we look for the right balance of properties. Carbon fiber is still an extremely important material when it comes to passenger safety, for example, but you only use it in certain areas.”

So the MEB’s steel design makes sense for an entry-level EV. Fuhrmann described how the platform could be elongated and widened for different applications. Firstly, the wheelbase can simply be stretched:

Second, the track width can be increased by making changes to the suspension, including to the lower control arms:

And finally, Fuhrmann said additional length could be added between the pedals and the front axle for premium vehicles like the I.D. Vizzion concept, likely along the crease in the cowl shown below:

The Powertrain

Volkswagen hasn’t revealed exactly how much horsepower its MEB vehicles will have, but the company mentions in its press literature that the rear-wheel drive I.D. concept car shown at the Paris Motor Show in 2016 had an output of 125 kW, or about 168 horsepower, and after speaking with VW, Autoweek wrote that the front motor on all-wheel drive MEB models could have median outputs of between 55 and 65 horsepower. The I.D. Vizzion and I.D. Buzz cargo concepts were both powered by a 201 horsepower motor in the rear, and the former also had a 100 horsepower unit up front according to VW. So 150 to 200 horses in the back and 50 to 100 horses up front seem like a reasonable guesses.

To put that in some more context, the Chevrolet Bolt, by comparison, offers a single motor up front producing 200 horsepower, while the Nissan Leaf puts out 147. The Tesla Model 3 Long Range’s rear motor produces 258 horsepower, and the all-wheel drive Dual Motor Performance models make up to 450 ponies combined, according to Motor Trend. (It’s worth noting that the combined figure on the all-wheel drive model is not just the sum of the two motor outputs). I also don’t know exactly which type of motor will be used up front or what, other than output, will make it different than the one in the rear, but I do know that the rear unit will be a Permanent Synchronous Motor or “PSM.” This motor and whatever’s used up front, VW says, will be the only two motors offered across the entire MEB line of at least 10 million vehicles in the automaker’s “first run.”

Yes, according to Fuhrmann, there will only be “two available motors for the entire platform.”

Despite this, motor output and acceleration, Fuhrman said, can be varied based on model via software changes and different ratios in the gearboxes, of which there will be two available across the entire MEB line for each the front and rear motor.

Those gearboxes will be housed in single units with the motors, as well as with the power electronics that convert DC current from the battery to AC current for the motors.

The image above shows that motor/gearbox/power electronics unit, as well as the flat battery pack bolted to the floor from below, the high voltage lines from the battery to the motor, and the multilink rear suspension. (There’s a MacPherson strut setup in the front.)

The motor unit and battery pack are both liquid cooled, with the former in a low temperature loop that includes a chiller (a refrigerant-to-coolant heat exchanger that allows for additional cooling beyond what a passive water-to-air radiator at the front of a typical automobile could offer) and the latter in a high-temp loop.

You can see the coolant hoses going to the motor in the photo above the previous one, and here’s a look at where the coolant lines enter and exit the front side of the battery pack:

Auxiliary Components

Under the hood, there’s still a 12-volt battery to power the vehicle’s onboard electronics and a large black HVAC module that’s normally found behind the dash in a typical non-electric vehicle’s interior. Down below towards the bottom of the car, there’s a high voltage refrigerant compressor, and to its right is a resistance heater for warming up the coolant that flows into the battery.

I didn’t have a chance to take a close look at the model’s cooling module (the stack of heat exchangers at the front of the car), but VW did say that there’s only a single radiator at the nose. This makes me think that the design is much like the Tesla Model 3's, which has one air-to-water radiator up front, along with an air-to-refrigerant condenser for the battery chiller (you can see the Tesla’s full schematic here).

And indeed, in the press image below and the photo above, I do see two heat exchangers, which back up that hypothesis, though I will say that, when I spoke with a VW engineer at a round table at the LA Auto Show in November, he seemed strangely hesitant to discuss the particulars about the cooling module.

And in an email with VW’s PR rep, I was told that the company wasn’t ready to discuss it further, making me wonder if VW’s got some kind of clever battery and motor cooling design brewing.

Photo by VW

Speaking of the cooling system, MEB-platform cars will have an optional heat pump, which is sort of like an air conditioning system in reverse, using heat from the powertrain and the outside environment to warm the cabin rather than relying solely on a battery powered electric heater. VW expects to yield an improvement of over 10 percent in overall range in the winter. The MEB’s system is likely similar in concept to what’s offered in the Nissan Leaf (whose schematic is shown above) and the current Volkswagen e-Golf, whose heat pump VW explained in a 2013 press release, saying:

...offered as an add-on module for the electric heating (high-voltage heater) and the electric air conditioning compressor, the heat pump utilises both the heat from the ambient air and the heat given off by the drive system components. In this way the high-voltage heater’s consumption of electric power is significantly reduced. Through use of the heat pump the e-Golf’s range increases in winter by up to 20 per cent.

If I had to guess, that heat pump will be packaged under hood somewhere, as it seems like VW has focused on maximizing interior space over allowing for a “frunk” for cargo items. That’s right, don’t expect a frunk on MEB vehicles, which is odd to not see on a car made off of a dedicated EV platform, one that wasn’t designed to have an engine up there. Sad, I know, because frunks are awesome.

On the topic of under-hood packaging, the bare MEB platform shown in Dresden was rear-wheel drive, and there didn’t appear to be much room up front for a motor. Fuhrmann told journalists that the HVAC box and the DC-DC converter—which I think sits below the HVAC box shown below and above—would have to move to accommodate a front motor, though its not clear where they’d be relocated.

These are just a few bits of hardware I noticed while sliding underneath the MEB and gazing under its hood. I hope to take a closer look soon.

Why Rear-Wheel Drive?

So you might be wondering: Why rear-wheel drive instead of front-drive? After all, VW’s had a pretty scant history of front-engine, rear-drive cars—it went pretty quickly from rear-engined, air-cooled cars to front-drive water-cooled ones in the 1970s and onward, adding AWD as needed.

When asked that question, Fuhrmann said the placement of the majority of the vehicle’s weight—between the wheels (because of the battery) instead of above the front wheels as seen on most front-drive cars of today—meant the rear wheels made the most sense from a traction standpoint. On top of that, he said, rear drive offered better vehicle agility.

“The rear-wheel drive is absolutely the right one for the electric drive,” he told journalists. He seemed convinced.

This is good news, because while car enthusiasts might decry the electric car revolution for the further death of manual transmissions and also the death of roaring engine sounds, at least some future economy cars will send power to the right set of wheels.

It’s fair to note that while front-wheel drive has been the standard for front-engine cars for decades, rear-wheel drive in economy cars was never unusual on cars that didn’t have a heavy internal combustion engine up front. Europe in particularly used to be churning out RWD economy cars from the 1930s through the early-to-mid 1970s, before everyone went universally front-engine on applications like this one.

The Interior

In the photo above, Fuhrmann is showing journalists the 30 liters of volume between the cowl and the instrument panel beam on the I.D.. Created by moving the HVAC forward into the front of the car, the space provides more area for what VW says will be a massive augmented reality head-up display, which the brand has been touting as a major feature in all of its I.D. concept vehicles. This space, Fuhrmann told journalists, could only be possible by reinventing a completely new platform.

Inside, occupants do sit fairly high up thanks to that tall battery pack, and there is a slight “tunnel” in the center, though it’s small and exists for the coolant lines that go from the cooling module up front to the battery in the middle and the motor in the rear. In addition, it’s meant to clear high voltage cables that go from the rear of the battery pack to components underhood like the high voltage compressor, high voltage heater, and DC-DC converter.

The Battery

Volkswagen calls its lithium-ion battery pack a “chocolate bar” design comprised of a number rectangle-shaped cell modules, which are housed in an aluminum case that has a heat exchanger integrated into its bottom.

As shown in the image above and below, the rear of the housing includes a Battery Management Controller, and while I’m not sure exactly what it does on the MEB platform, on the e-Golf, this part was in charge of functions including “regular diagnosis and monitoring to helping regulate temperatures in the battery junction controller,” VW writes in an old press release. Between the two rows of modules sit cell controllers, which are used for monitoring cell current, voltage, temperatures (VW told journalists that temperature is technically monitored on the module level) and also for cell balancing to ensure longevity and optimal performance.

Slide by VW

Volkswagen plans to use two different kinds of cells in the modules within the MEB battery packs: prismatic and pouch cells (you can see them both below), since round cells wouldn’t package as densely.

LG will supply the pouch cells and Samsung will provide the prismatic cells. VW told me that any vehicle could have one or both of these cell types in its modules. Using these two battery types was done on purpose, VW says, to afford a “high degree of flexibility in the cooperation with cell suppliers.”

Also using pouch cells are the Nissan Leaf, the Chevy Bolt, and the Jaguar I-Pace electric SUV, with the first having Nissan’s own cells, and the latter two—like VW—getting theirs from LG.

According to Korea Times, Jaguar Land Rover has been talking with Samsung about using 21700 cylindrical cells, which Tesla has been manufacturing with Panasonic for the Model 3, touting the cell’s low cost and high energy density.

You’ll notice in the picture above a zigzag-shaped gray substance. That’s what’s found below each module, and it’s called thermoconductive gap filler, helping ensure that heat from the battery cells gets transferred to the heat exchanger integrated into the case below.

Speaking of that heat exchanger, both the inlet and outlet ports are in the front side of the case, as shown before in the underbody photo, and more clearly below:

By contrast, Tesla actually winds coolant tubes between individual cells, rather than below modules. Here’s a look at the Model 3's battery cooling setup:

Also shown in the cutout in the corner of the VW’s battery pack above is what appears to be a protective (possibly steel?) plate, which I assume is the “solid collision protection” that VW mentions in its press release sits below the aluminum battery case, and likely acts to avoid battery cell puncture. The Tesla Model 3 and the Chevy Bolt do things a little differently, with a manufacturing expert at auto benchmarking firm Munro & Associates telling me that the two vehicles have battery cases whose outsides are made largely of stamped steel, with no obvious separate shield. On the other side of the MEB’s battery pack is a thin cover that can be unbolted for maintenance.

In the diagram a few pictures up and in the picture above the last one, you’ll notice aluminum “cross struts” between the modules. Those are there for crash protection, increasing the stiffness of the battery pack, which is important, since it is a structural part that adds to the vehicle’s overall rigidity.

Image by VW

VW contrasts this flat battery pack setup with that of the e-Golf, an internal combustion vehicle that was modified to fit batteries, and not a purpose-built EV. Its odd shaped battery, VW told us, isn’t cost or weight effective, requiring long connectors and strange mounts. The MEB battery, on the other hand, is apparently easier to scale up, easier to cool, easier to install, and—of course—it lowers the center of gravity and can yield more interior space.

MEB’s battery voltage will depend on the number of cells and cell types, VW says, but at the beginning of production, nominal voltage will range between 300 and 400 volts. Battery pack capacity will be either 48, 62, or roughly 82 kWh, with the 48 kWh and 62 kWh sharing the same pack (the 48 kWh simply has two fewer cell modules), and the 82 kWh pack having a different, larger housing. The smallest battery promises 175 miles on the EPA cycle, the biggest will get a projected 300 mile range, and the 52 kWh pack will be somewhere in between.

By comparison, the Tesla Model 3's long range and short range battery packs offer an EPA-estimated 310 and 264 miles of range, respectively (Electrek says those respective packs have capacities of 74kWh and 62 kWh), the Chevrolet Bolt’s 60 kWh battery pack is good for 238 miles, and the Nissan Leaf offers a 40kWh pack with 151 miles of range. A 60kWh Leaf with a projected 225 mile range is expected to debut soon coming soon. So the VW’s 175 mi to 300 mi estimate for the 48 kWh to 82 kWh packs seem competitive—perhaps a bit short for the 82 kWh pack, but again, we’ll have to see when the EPA figures come out how close those estimates are to reality.

Image by VW

VW says even the smallest of the MEB cars will be able to house the largest battery pack, and all cars have packaging space reserved for inductive charging.

On the topic of charging, VW mentioned a maximum charging rate of 125kW, which can apparently charge a battery pack to 80 percent in 30 minutes. Green Car Reports and other car news outlets state that, initially, that 125kW charging capability will be limited to the largest 82 kWh battery pack, with the smaller two limited to 100 kW.

Slide by VW

VW’s cells will start as NMC—Nickel Manganese Cobalt —622s (cathode chemistry that is fairly standard in the auto industry today, but not used by Tesla), as reported by German newspaper Handelsblatt. But, as shown in VW’s image above, by 2020, the company thinks the higher energy density, lower-cost NMC 811 cells will be ready—cells that are being touted by someas the future of electric car batteries, and key enablers to bringing EVs mainstream. How long it will take for VW to transition to these cells is unclear. Also, as shown in the plot, solid state batteries are still on the horizon. VW did mention its partnership with California-based tech company Quantumscape, and said a solid-state battery trial project is scheduled between 2023 and 2025.

How VW Plans to Bring MEBs to the Masses

Economies of Scale

In his speech, Thomas Ulbricht said there are three “pillars” that VW is basing its electric vehicle strategy on: the MEB platform itself, economies of scale, and infrastructure. We’ve already looked at the platform, and for economies of scale, Ulbricht has big plans.

VW says it will build the electric cars in 16 “e-locations” around the world by late 2022, including some in Europe and one plant in the U.S. VW isn’t sure exactly where, but calls Chattanooga a “natural fit.” Most of the plants, though, will be in China, where about 50 percent of 2025's 1 million annual EVs will be sold, with Europe representing about 30 to 40 percent, and the U.S. representing around 10 to 20 percent. Of the roughly $39 billion VW says it will invest in future tech by 2022, around $1.4 billion will go to the Zwickau plant in Germany, where the first ever MEB model—the Volkswagen I.D. four-door compact car—will go into production in late 2019 as the facility begins its transition from internal combustion engine vehicles to fully electric and fully MEB by the end of 2020. Annual volume of MEB-based electric cars out of Zwickau is expected be a staggering 330,000 vehicles per year. (For some context: In 2015, BMW’s South Carolina plant—which builds nearly all the SUVs that BMW sells globally—made about 400,000 cars. In other words, VW’s output of EVs is going to be huge, a gamble as big as the investment itself.)

Slide by VW

There are, of course, challenges with reliably obtaining all those batteries, which is why VW is working with not just LG and Samsung, but also battery companies SK Innovations and CATL.

To ensure a reliable supply chain when it comes to batteries, VW says it actually meets with LG’s board in Poland every second week to help get the company ready for cars. Thomas Ulbrich outlined the supply-chain related risks, with Automotive News Europe quoting him as saying:

“There are risks in third- and fourth-tier areas, especially in these new technologies. This is the reason why we created this task force with LG Chem,” Thomas Ulbrich, the VW brand’s management board member responsible for electric mobility, told reporters in Dresden, Germany.

[...]

“The battery cell availability is for us the base really to produce the cars,” Ulbrich said, “but we are taking care of it.”

As for other components, Ulbrich said VW in Europe would use primarily its existing supply chain used to build millions of VW Group products in Europe. He also said, when asked about building in the U.S. rather than Mexico, that VW feels responsible for “built in America,” mentioning that the U.S. has a stronger supply chain than its southern neighbor.

Infrastructure

But we all know that one of the major issues that could bring VW’s lofty electrification plans to a halt is the lack of a charging network.

Among things the company mentioned on this topic was the debut of a new 11 kW “wall box” at-home charger that VW says will be available in all markets when the Neo launches, and will start at 300 euros in Europe. This is not dissimilar to the Wall Connector that Tesla sells for $500.

In addition, VW dealerships will become EV charging locations. “Our dealer will become a publicly available charging network,” VW’s head of e-mobility services Martin Römheld told journalists, going on to say that all 4,000 VW brand dealership and service centers in Europe must have two 11kW AC chargers and one 20kW DC charger by the time the ID “Neo” launches in 2020, and that every new dealer from here on must have those chargers as part of their plans. This is similar to what Nissan did for Leaf owners, with varying degrees of success.

Volkswagen also highlighted the fact that it—along with Ford, Daimler, and BMW—cofounded Ionity, a charging network in Europe that plans to build 400 stations by 2020 (47 are currently operational). And the Wolfsburg-based carmaker mentioned Electrify America—a company created as a part of the automaker’s Dieselgate settlement with the U.S. government—as a key to helping solve the infrastructure issue.

These are obviously tiny steps considering the vast expense associated with building EV infrastructure, but they’re at least something.

Is This The Platform That Brings EVs to the Masses?

The electric car revolution has already begun thanks in large part to government regulations and incentives in China, Europe, and even the U.S., and also thanks to solid EV offerings from Nissan, Chevrolet, and Tesla.

VW has clearly taken quite a bit out of the latter’s book with the flat skateboard-like battery, rear-wheel drive setup, and the mostly steel design. But while Tesla is relatively new at large scale manufacturing and learning as it goes, VW is a manufacturing powerhouse with clever platform-sharing skills, enormous volumes, and a diverse supply chain, so it will be interesting to see just how affordable the company can make EVs.

And, even more so, whether people will buy them, and whether infrastructure can keep up.

Hyundai N Performance division working on 'exotic' halo model like the RM16

This is the year of Hyundai N Performance. After three official launches, the division's leadership has made imprecise noises about a halo car since this summer. Brand boss Albert Biermann said, "Right now, we don't need a halo car in N. We have to get in a routine with N cars, and not just hit a peak." Around the same time, VP Thomas Schmera said, "Rest assured we are coming up with something," that something being a halo car. Reports expected either a two-seat coupe or a four-door sedan like the Kia Stinger. In a recent interview with AutoRAI, Schmera narrowed the focus, saying, "Think of the Hyundai RM16 and you have a bit of an idea of ​​what is possible."

The RM16 is the third iteration of the mid-engined Veloster RM first showed at the Busan Motor Show in 2014. In 2015 the RM15 debuted at the same motor show, followed in 2016 by the RM16. By then, the performance specs listed a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with 296 horsepower, an electric compressor and electronic differential, rear-wheel drive and a six-speed manual. The bodywork, draped on an aluminum spaceframe, channeled the spirits of other outrageous mid-engined hatchbacks like the Renault 5 Turbo, Renault Clio V6 Renault Sport, and Lancia Delta S4.

Four months after showing the RM16, Hyundai took a running prototype to the Nürburgring (pictured). Earlier this year we heard tale of a new Theta III engine suited for front- and rear-wheel drive, and mid-engined applications. With the ability to be tuned to 350 hp, this led to suspicion that there could be a mid-engined Hyundai sports car on the way. The evidence is circumstantial, but now we have Schmera telling us to consider a long-lived mid-engined concept as the potential template for a future N Performance halo car.

The idea of Hyundai rolling out a mid-engined coupe sounds crazy. It sounds doubly crazy when Biermann has said of the i30 N, "This is a halo car that can make [the company] money, so what better halo can we get?" Hyundai knows its math better than we do, but we don't see how the carmaker makes money in a segment ruled by the Porsche 718 twins under $100K, and by a number of storied brands above that figure. The triple crazy comes when Schmera told the Dutch outlet in the same interview, "This is going to be a great machine, something nobody expects from Hyundai, something really exotic," and, "It will be a car in the super sport segment...."

Whatever is on the way, it could be a limited edition, it might include a hybrid system, and it likely won't break cover for a couple of years, but we're already looking forward to it.

 

Source:
Autoblog

Finalist for Green Car Reports Best Car To Buy 2019: Hyundai Kona Electric

In our quest to find Green Car Reports’ Best Car To Buy, the 2019 Hyundai Kona Electric is shaping up to be the “no drama” candidate.

By now, we’ve had four distinct experiences with this small, fully electric crossover—or tall hatchback, depending on how you see it. That’s included plodding along on congestion-choked Los Angeles boulevards; zigzagging along tight canyon roads just outside LA; running over potholed, battered suburban streets and highways around Detroit; and then, specifically for our Best Car To Buy roundup, at an undisclosed location in the American Southeast, taking additional test drives on curvy back roads and a variety of road surfaces.

Through all these use cases, we’ve found the Kona Electric to fit right in—even, surprisingly, with the canyon roads, where its lower center of mass added confidence despite low-rolling-resistance tires that didn’t give us a lot to work with. The 201-horsepower (150-kw) electric motor system makes the Kona Electric feel strong, even tire-scorching at times. Like the Chevrolet Bolt EV, motor torque is delivered only through the front wheels.

Around town is where the Kona Electric makes the most sense. With a near-perfect seating point for most drivers, it’s easy to get in and out, and you have a good view outward. Seats are generously padded, there’s enough headroom in back, and there’s no versatility compromised for the sake of a big battery pack. The rear seat backs fold flat (when compressed) to make a flat load floor. Parking is a cinch, thanks to the Kona’s subcompact footprint (it’s just 164.6 inches long and 70.9 inches wide).

Yet the Kona Electric has plenty of something that really matters among electric cars: driving range and reasonably quick charging rates. Its liquid-cooled 64-kwh battery, packed with LG Chem prismatic cells, seemed to overdeliver on its 258-mile EPA range estimate as far as we could tell, and in all those driving conditions we never saw an instance of driving range unexpectedly dropping. The pack charges up in just over 9.5 hours on Level 2, using its 7.2-kw onboard charger, according to Hyundai. Thanks to the loan of an eMotorWerks JuiceBox Pro 40, we were able to bring this UL-listed device to our testing location, plug it into a semi-outdoor NEMA 14-50 socket, and charge the Kona Electric up from just under 50 percent to 100 percent in less than five hours.

And if you happen to find a 100-kw or higher CCS Combo DC fast charger, it can recover up to 206 miles in just 54 minutes. We continue to be impressed with the Kona Electric’s highly customizable brake regeneration functions, which allow you to customize each of three (Normal, Eco, Sport) modes with their own default levels of brake regen, ranging from 0 (coasting) to 3 (aggressive).

Pulling the left paddle to engage relatively mild one-pedal driving felt awkward in our first drive but we’ve found it intuitive in follow-up drives, so this is something that you’d find second-nature after a while, coasting gradually to a stop without touching the brake pedal in some cases. 

The Kona Electric comes with an infotainment system that’s easy to navigate and responsive and yet doesn’t take up a vast swath of the space around the driver. Hyundai has also teased an entire suite of remote-and-connected features like charge scheduling, climate preconditioning, remote charging management, and compatibility with Google Home, Android Wear devices, and Apple Watch apps. You can set minimum and maximum charging levels with simple sliders—something that’s not possible with many rival models.

We haven’t found any gaps in our initial impressions of an exceptionally well-hushed cabin, damping out wind and road noise, and most of our editorial staff has grown to prefer the more understated look of the Kona Electric to that of the standard Kona. As we said in our first drive, some versions get a little too liberal with somewhat illegible matte-metallic switchgear facing too soon to be 2005-retro. If this all sounds abundantly positive, it is. But there are two big questions that remain unanswered. One is pricing. Hyundai hasn’t released details yet, but it says that it wants Kona Electric to start below $30,000 when factoring in the federal EV tax credit.

The second is availability. The Kona starts reaching California dealerships before the end of the year, with East Coast dealerships and other CARB-observant states getting them in early February.

Hyundai says you’ll be able to walk into any dealership and order one, but that leads to one of the key questions: Is the Kona Electric just another compliance car? Or will it truly sell as many as it can? That remains to be seen.

 

Source: Greencarreports.com

New Flagship Hyundai Palisade SUV Set to Debut at 2018 LA Auto Show

Hyundai is planning on revealing its new flagship three-row SUV on Nov. 28 at the upcoming L.A. Auto Show, according to a recent press release. The SUV will be called the Palisade in reference to the imposing Pacific Palisades portion of California's Sierra Nevada mountain range. 

“The future Palisade SUV will convey a bold exterior that commands attention and has strong inherent imagery of safety and security, especially important with parents with growing families and active lifestyles,” according to Hyundai. The full exterior has not yet been revealed but the teaser image provided in this article provides a small look at the tailgate and its shape.

Hyundai has not released any information about what platform this vehicle will ride on or if there will be an upscale Genesis version as well. Hyundai's luxury spin-off brand has struggled for sales lately as buyers transition from sedans into crossovers. Genesis does not currently offer any SUVs, but the Palisade base could potentially change that if Hyundai chooses to go in that direction.

In the crossover and SUV categories, Hyundai currently offers the Kona, Tucson, Santa Fe, and Santa Fe XL. The Santa Fe XL is currently the largest model offered by Hyundai and comes in either six or seven-passenger versions.

Hyundai says the Palisade will go on sale in the States in the summer of 2019. Pricing and trim levels have yet to be announced. The Drive reached out to Hyundai for comment and further details and will update this article as information becomes available. 

The L.A. Auto Show has press days with numerous reveals and major announcements that will run from Nov. 26-29 before the show opens to the public on Nov. 30.

Isuzu Concept X: Extreme off roading

suzu revealed the Concept X, Isuzu Team D-MAX-tuned monster trucks based on top of the Isuzu D-Max truck and the Isuzu MU-X SUV. Created in Australia for promotional and market research purposes, the Isuzu Concept X trucks feature a comprehensive set of off-road additions that make them exceptionally capable on rough terrain and challenging surfaces. EMG director Wayne Boatwright said; “We didn’t set out to build a racer, a rock crawler, or yet another version of the ultimate 4WD tourer.” He added, “It would have been easy just to bolt on a lot of accessories, but we really wanted to ‘go our own way,’ so most of the build — the guards, bull bars, bonnet, brakes, suspension and chassis mods — are all in-house custom work.”

Off-Road Accessories

Just by looking at them, the Concept X trucks seem to be perfectly suited for off-roading adventures. Created with great help from Isuzu Ute Australia and Toyo tires, EMG almost managed to turn the popular D-MAX truck and the MU-X SUV into proper monster trucks. Ok, I did exaggerate a little bit, but the fact is that these Isuzu passenger vehicles have massive tires. I am talking here about the 38×15.5-inch Open Country 20LT off-road tires as Australian Motoring reports. They have also said each of them costs a minimum of $1,000.

It seems that EMG did not experiment with different setups here. In fact, both of these trucks have the same basic layout with additions like the 7-inch lift kit. This alone, in conjunction with massive tires, increased the ground clearance to an amazing 370 millimeters. This is easily enough for some serious off-road shenanigans. Bespoke suspension parts do complement the new shock absorbers and the lift-kit as a whole. As these are made for ultimate off-roading capability with formidable fording capacity, EMG fitted the Concept X machines with a winch capable of pulling 10,000 pounds. Each has two - one in the front and one in the rear.

Considering all the additions, the Concept X trucks seem to be perfectly adapted for Australian wilderness. All with powerful 3.0-liter 4JJ turbo diesel engines linked with a six-speed automatic transmission. Of course, the Americans aren’t that much into diesel, but the sheer torque of such machines makes them perfect for all sorts of off-road shenanigans. This three liter develops 180 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque. EMG officials are smitten by it:

“Their [Isuzu] diesel engines are simply the best in the business, and the whole package has been outstanding in terms of reliability.” This coming from a man who has been working with Toyota and many other companies.

How They Were Made

EMG was largely responsible for the Concept X’s development. The company worked on them for 12 months continuously improving the design as the new parts come in. It seems that the biggest issue was fitting the tires as Boatwright of EMG actually noted that tires of this size have never before been fitted on an Isuzu. As a pioneer, the company faced another issue after the tires were fitted. The Concept X truck looked quite funny with them installed. In that regard, the company started with a massive redesign and ended up forming an all-new body-kit.

“It just started with the tires, no one that we know has put 38-inch tires on an Isuzu and you can’t even get them in Australia. I imported the wheels at almost $10,000 for one car and all of a sudden we just started redesigning the whole thing because they looked so tough,” Boatwright told Drive at National 4x4 Outdoors, Fishing & Boating Expo in Melbourne where EMG revealed the trucks.

The end result seems to be quite impressive. Some of the 3D printed parts ended up on the Concept X offroaders, but I find the wide-body kit the meanest of them all. Both trucks received a steel-built body-kit. As tough as the trucks themselves. The bumpers are also all-new, as is the bonnet and the whole front end. Obviously, all in the name of ruggedness.

I like it.

“It would have been easy just to bolt on a lot of accessories, but we really wanted to go our own way, so most of the build; the guards, bull bars, bonnet, brakes, suspension and chassis mods are all in-house custom work,” said EMG CEO Wayne Boatwright. In my mind, this only elevates the uniqueness and the exclusivity factor of the Isuzu Concept X trucks.

Thanks to the all-new front and back end, as well as more clearance, the approach, and departure angles,  have been further increased to 50 and 38 degrees, respectively.

Despite the rather dramatically changes to the exterior, the Isuzu D-Max and the MU-X remained the same inside. Nothing changed there which means that you could have the full comfort of the LS-T spec while trying to tackle the next impossible obstacle.

Conclusion

The Isuzu Concept X truck is actually an effort created to test the market interest for the possible development of a Concept X inspired kit.

It is simple - Isuzu, just make it. This thing is rad.

However, EMG does not have any plans for developing or offering vehicles like this on the market. If it did, I could see some choosing the Isuzu D-MAX Concept X instead of, say, the Ford Ranger Raptor.

Source: Top Speed

Tony Hartman Kok

Sales Manager
E: tony@garagecentraal.com
T: 730-3000
        

Johnny Milan

Senior Sales Associate
E: jmilan@garagecentraal.com
T: 593-3778
        

Demis Thielman

Sales Associate
E: dthielman@garagecentraal.com
T: 739-1974
        

Lizzette Koolman

Sales Associate
E: lkoolman@garagecentraal.com
T: 594-4900
        

Alex Dijkhoff

Sales Associate
E: adijkhoff@garagecentraal.com
T: 592-6075
        

Adolfo Gonzalez

Sales Associate
E: agonzalez@garagecentraal.com
T: 563-5074
        

Jerald Winterdal

Sales Associate
E: jwinterdal@garagecentraal.com
T: 660-2425
        

Alberto de L'Isle

Commercial and Fleet Sales
E: adelisle@garagecentraal.com
T: 744-1455
        

About Garage Centraal

The goal of Garage Centraal Aruba is simple: that everyone that needs a vehicle is able to have a vehicle that satisfies their needs and expectations, with expert service and parts support.

That is why we offer brand new, award winning vehicles from the renowned Hyundai brand, as well as Isuzu pickups and trucks. We also offer an extensive catalog of commercial vehicles from Hyundai as well as Hyundai Construction.

Search